Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

by josephkijewski1
2 min read 1

4

Building effective altruismCareer choiceCommunity experiencesFellowships and internships
Frontpage
Show all topics

Internships with .impact: My Experience

 

As described by Soeren Mindermann in his recent post on working at .impact, internships are available working with some of the most involved .impact members (as well as full-time or part-time jobs, working remotely or in Vancouver). If you’re interested in exploring these, email your CV to tog.ash@gmail.com. This post describes my experience doing an internship with .impact over this summer.

 

    Overall, I found my internship at .impact to be an interesting and rewarding learning experience. Since the people most heavily involved with .impact have so much work to be done, there is considerable freedom in choosing what you would like to do. For example, I quickly found that I enjoyed editing, so this became a large portion of what I was assigned.

Another advantage of the large amount of work to be done at .impact is that there is essentially no cap on the number of hours you can volunteer. For example, if you have a free weekend, you can spend all day volunteering. Additionally, since there are few hard deadlines, there is considerable flexibility regarding when you can work. I found this extremely helpful as I didn’t have to worry about missing a day or two, provided I made up the time later in the week. Typically, interns are expected to make a firm minimum weekly commitment, however this commitment can be as low as a few hours per week.

Another aspect that sets an internship at .impact apart is that when you work here, you feel like you are working with them rather than for them. Within a week or two after I had started, I felt like I was part of the team, and that my input was as important as anyone else’s. Furthermore, many people working at or affiliated with .impact reached out to me during the first weeks of my internship, and I felt welcomed. Additionally, most employees and volunteers at .impact are younger, which, for me as a high school student, made them a lot less intimidating.

As mentioned earlier, there is a wide variety of work to choose from. Some of my tasks included coordinating group meetups, editing research reports, and doing my own research on practical topics, to name but a few. I also had a number of smaller recurring assignments, such as creating weekly facebook events. All tasks are neatly listed on the website Asana with a description of what to do and a (usually rough) deadline. This is fantastic if you’re as disorganized as me, and also fantastic if you’re organized and like everything in one place.

 

If you're interested, here are a few tips:

  • Tom Ash uses a lot of different websites to coordinate projects. During my time, Asana and Slack were both adopted by .impact for task management and communication respectively. These websites are extremely useful, so make sure you learn how to use them.

  • Don’t be afraid to send an email if you’re confused about an assignment; everyone’s very friendly.

  • Familiarize yourself with Google Docs/Spreadsheets. A large portion of my work was done using these.

4

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Mentioned in

More posts like this

Comments1


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Tom_Ash0
0
0

See also Sören Mindermann's description of full-time and part-time paid job opportunities at .impact: http://effective-altruism.com/ea/pw/working_at_ea_organizations_series_impact/

Reply
More from josephkijewski1
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
[Cross-posted from my Substack here] If you spend time with people trying to change the world, you’ll come to an interesting conundrum: Various advocacy groups reference previous successful social movements as to why their chosen strategy is the most important one. Yet, these groups often follow wildly different strategies from each other to achieve social change. So, which one of them is right? The answer is all of them and none of them. This is because many people use research and historical movements to justify their pre-existing beliefs about how social change happens. Simply, you can find a case study to fit most plausible theories of how social change happens. For example, the groups might say: * Repeated nonviolent disruption is the key to social change, citing the Freedom Riders from the civil rights Movement or Act Up! from the gay rights movement. * Technological progress is what drives improvements in the human condition if you consider the development of the contraceptive pill funded by Katharine McCormick. * Organising and base-building is how change happens, as inspired by Ella Baker, the NAACP or Cesar Chavez from the United Workers Movement. * Insider advocacy is the real secret of social movements – look no further than how influential the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights was in passing the Civil Rights Acts of 1960 & 1964. * Democratic participation is the backbone of social change – just look at how Ireland lifted a ban on abortion via a Citizen’s Assembly. * And so on… To paint this picture, we can see this in action below: Source: Just Stop Oil which focuses on…civil resistance and disruption Source: The Civic Power Fund which focuses on… local organising What do we take away from all this? In my mind, a few key things: 1. Many different approaches have worked in changing the world so we should be humble and not assume we are doing The Most Important Thing 2. The case studies we focus on are likely confirmation bias, where
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
Although some of the jokes are inevitably tasteless, and Zorrilla is used to set up punchlines, I enjoyed it and it will surely increase concerns and donations for shrimp. I'm not sure what impression the audience will have of EA in general.  Last week The Daily Show interviewed Rutger Bregman about his new book Moral Ambition (which includes a profile of Zorrilla and SWP). 
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
Americans, we need your help to stop a dangerous AI bill from passing the Senate. What’s going on? * The House Energy & Commerce Committee included a provision in its reconciliation bill that would ban AI regulation by state and local governments for the next 10 years. * Several states have led the way in AI regulation while Congress has dragged its heels. * Stopping state governments from regulating AI might be okay, if we could trust Congress to meaningfully regulate it instead. But we can’t. This provision would destroy state leadership on AI and pass the responsibility to a Congress that has shown little interest in seriously preventing AI danger. * If this provision passes the Senate, we could see a DECADE of inaction on AI. * This provision also violates the Byrd Rule, a Senate rule which is meant to prevent non-budget items from being included in the reconciliation bill.   What can I do? Here are 3 things you can do TODAY, in order of priority: 1. (5 minutes) Call and email both of your Senators. Tell them you oppose AI preemption, and ask them to raise a point of order that preempting state AI regulation violates the Byrd Rule. * Find your Senators here. * Here’s an example of a call:  “Hello, my name is {YOUR NAME} and I’m a resident of {YOUR STATE}. The newest budget reconciliation bill includes a 10-year ban pre-empting state AI legislation without establishing any federal guardrails. This is extremely concerning to me – leading experts warn us that AI could cause mass harm within the next few years, but this provision would prevent states from protecting their citizens from AI crises for the next decade. It also violates the Byrd Rule, since preempting state AI regulation doesn’t impact federal taxes or spending. I’d like the Senator to speak out against this provision and raise a point of order that this provision should not be included under the Byrd Rule.” See here for sample call + email temp
Relevant opportunities
View more