Jess_Riedel comments on Can we set up a system for international donation trading? - Effective Altruism Forum

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (23)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Jess_Riedel 04 March 2015 01:55:03PM *  5 points [-]

I am mildly worried that connecting strangers to make honor-system donation trades could lead to a dispute. There are going to be more and more new faces around if the various EA growth strategies this year pan out. The fact that donation trading has been going on smoothly until now means folks might get overly relaxed, and it only takes one publicized dispute to really do damage to the culture. Even if no one is outright dishonest, miscommunication could lead to a someone thinking they have been wronged to the tune of thousands of dollars.

I don't think that communication between the donors, as Brian mentions, is fully satisfactory. Even if everyone promises to send receipts afterwards, you still have Byzantine generals' problems. One idea is that we find someone at CEA who, at the least, can be listed as an email contact to which two donors can send their agreement before they execute, just so there's a records and so the CEA person can point out any obvious confusion. I think this could be a very efficient use of CEA time, especially if it increases trust and therefore makes more trades possible.

Comment author: vollmer 09 March 2015 09:24:24AM *  3 points [-]

From the discussion I gather that we're facing the following challenges:

  • Trust
  • Handling amounts that can't be traded
  • Maybe some technical challenges – once the number of trades, charities and countries increases, overview and coordination might become more difficult
  • Also, the charities will want to know who the actual donors are, and thank them

These challenges could be resolved by a global network of EA organisations who offer donation trading (and, if possible in their legislation, donation regranting). Trust and professional communications and management seems easier to achieve with organisations who stick around longer-term than with individuals.

At GBS Switzerland, we already have some of the technical and legal components needed for this (we're tax-deductible in several countries, can regrant donations, have a significant amount of donors who don't pay taxes, and have some nice spreadsheets). Making progress in this direction is not a top priority for us at the moment, but if you're interested in one of the things I've mentioned, please get in touch with me (and also Tom Ash, as he mentions below).

Comment author: Tom_Ash  (EA Profile) 09 March 2015 07:07:28PM 2 points [-]

Agreed, doing it through organisations is probably better. Brian, how about putting people who fill in the spreadsheet in touch with the relevant organisations? Right now that'd be GBS for Switzerland and the countries listed at http://effectivealtruismhub.com/actions/donating/europe plus Charity Science for Canada - plus any other organisations that are willing to participate.

Comment author: Brian_Tomasik 09 March 2015 08:36:26PM 0 points [-]

Looks like Jonas entered GBS into the Google Doc. Would you like to add Charity Science for Canada to it?

I think the people besides me in the GDoc already have their charity of choice tax-deductible and only added themselves as possible trading partners.

My impression is that trading through organizations only works for a restricted set of charities? It possible in theory to create an org that can donate to any charity in a set of countries? I guess that's what TIDES, Charities Aid Foundation, etc. do, but there's overhead to set that up. If so, there's still value in trading among individuals.

Comment author: Tom_Ash  (EA Profile) 09 March 2015 11:00:21PM 3 points [-]


Yes, it's restricted for us and GBS has a restricted list named on their site. And yes, it'd be a lot of overhead to register a whole new charity just for this. I have been setting up an EA donation routing mechanism in the US which might be able to do this though.

Comment author: Tom_Ash  (EA Profile) 07 March 2015 12:16:45AM 0 points [-]

Brian, would you (or someone you find) be happy to be the arbiter?

Comment author: Brian_Tomasik 07 March 2015 04:46:11PM 0 points [-]

In the near term I'd be glad to do that, since I don't expect a high work load. In the longer term, if trading picks up steam, we can find something more permanent.

Comment author: RyanCarey 04 March 2015 03:29:55PM 0 points [-]

It seems good to have an arbiter...

Comment author: Brian_Tomasik 05 March 2015 06:01:30AM 1 point [-]

Great point! Normally such problems are handled by an escrow, but that won't work here, since the individual donors need to make the donations, not a third party.

In theory, one solution for minimizing risk would be to donate incrementally, e.g., only $1K at a time, so that the maximum loss would be $1K. But it would be burdensome to do so many small donations and share receipts after each one.