Earlier this month I made a fairly long post on nuclear policy with many considerations for how different technologies might upset or improve nuclear deterrence, and why epistemic humility is extremely valuable as some EAs begin to focus more on policy.
To centralize discussion of this, I think it is best to post comments on the post above here on the EA forum. The post would have been made here, but unfortunately there is a lot of html, which vastly improves the readability of the post via compression, but does not work on the EA Forum. Leave any comments you have below.
It seems like there's very little work being done by EAs in this area. Is that your impression as someone who has spent a good amount of time talking to the relevant people? Do you think it would be good for more EAs to go into this area relative to the current numbers working on different causes?
I am not sure we should focus more into this area, I just want to make sure that in general, people who go into policy or advocacy don't propagate bad ideas, or discredit EA with important people who would otherwise be aligned with our goals in the future.
I do think that knowing the history of transformative technologies (and policies that effected how they were deployed) will have a lot of instrumental value for EAs trying to make good decisions about things like gene editing and AI.